Irq nobody cared e1000 software

I finally convinced my girlfriend to loan me her ipod. Ive just updated to fedora 11, but i still have the same problem. We have a test where we set the tcp mss to a small value and then generate traffic at high speeds. Asus p8h67vr3 latest bios 0712, default settings except ahci and vtenabled corei52500k 4 x 4gb corsair cmx8gx3m2a33c9 onboard video and ethernet eth1, at11c driver one additional. It can appear in 34 minutes or half an hour, it depends. The nobody cared happens when when an interrupt is raised but no service routine is installed. Often a more recent fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes. Hello helpers, i am seeing the below logs in my rhel5 64bit linux machine. Do not load the unused modules that are causing the nobody cared problem.

The proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Of course the uhcihcd interrupt routine doesnt handle it, and the e100 driver hasnt been loaded yet. From this point on i have not been able to transfer any larger file across my network without a getting e. Rhel5 guest network goes down after the log message irq 59. Ive been trying to bisect the patch that causes this problem. Hi, one of my old servers had a trace yesterday, and from that moment on it keeps running but lost network.

For me it started somewhere in the latter ubuntu and debian versions of the 2. Rtl8169s rtl89 driver and intel 82541pi intel e driver. With me, ndiswrapper is given irq 11, but as soon as x starts up using the via unichrome driver i get the irq 11. A conflict event was happened with ethernet port e. Could anyone help me on this to find what causes the logs appeared.

It could be that the original issue that required you to boot with bnoapicb for your particular hardware has been resolved in the newer kernels and it was the use of the bnoapicb boot option with the latest kernel that was icausingi the b irq 7. What seems weird to me is that there is not much it seems on irq16. Suggested use of irqpoll kernel parameter results in almost identical backtrace and a warning that irq. I found an additional system which fails, an intel stl2 an old dual piii with a serverworks chipset that does this. Rhel5 e driver crashes when run as vmware guest red. Also, this occured about 30 mins after i downloaded the most recent updates, which was. The virtual machine serves as a mysql server, it has 4vcpu and 4096mb assigned. This is the situation when none of the registered irq handlers cared of this interrupt. The log messages seem to indicate the the network adapter was sending an interrupt request that the ee module was not handling. The machine seems to be running fine, but it would be nice to know what the cause of this dump is. I like to keep things as simple as possible, so removing all iunnecessaryi boot options is a sensible choice.

While bringing down an interface, the e driver failed to properly handle irqs interrupt requests, resulting in the reception of the following messages. Kernel tries to find origin of interrupt loop through handlers on irq line no handler is found that could handle the interrupt interrupt is counted as unhandled unhandled interrupts are called spurious interrupts kernel tracks spurious interrupts irq line disabled when too many spurious interrupts. Another approach might be to blame the e driver straight away since. Or that the scheduler failed to call an irq handler.

My system is a intel nuc dc3217iye base with a few usb devices connected. Nothing happens until uhcihcd loads and enables that irq line, at which time the cpu receives the interrupt from the e100 device. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a proxmox. Discovered it was a hardware issue with how interrupts were passed from the pci controller to pciexpress controller intel pci6466 chipset. Asus p8h67vr3 latest bios 0712, default settings except ahci and vtenabled corei52500k 4 x 4gb corsair cmx8gx3m2a33c9 onboard video and ethernet eth1, at11c driver one additional rtl89 or broadcom bcm5702x pci ethernet for eth0 fails identically with either no other cards fc14 with 2. Detected tx unit hang b complete lock up ive tried to use the older kernel that used to work fine, but it has the same problem now. One of those four drivers in that list the first is probably the sata controller on the motherboard is ignoring its interrupts, or maybe there is some other device issuing irq 16 that has no driver. Please attach the output of the dmesg command and the output of lspci vnn separate plaintext attachments. This could be because pci interrupts arent routed correctly on your board.

Can you please save output of following commands into file and send it to me. On thinkpad x30 running fedora 7 with latest updates, kernel boot gives a backtrace after irq 11. A service network restart restores the guest network connectivity. A conflict event was happened with ethernet port e during the upload linux kernel with redboot. Intel corporation 82574l gigabit network connection. Maybe they should just buy everyone one new card for each chip they have andor offer.

With this update, the drivers down flag is set later in the process of bringing down an interface, specifically, after all timers have exited, preventing the irq. This causes the nic to segment packets, giving us some easy hardwareaccel for creating lots of small packets on the wire. Rhel5 guest was not reachable via network, but it can be accessed via esx console. If several things share irq 10 or any irq for that matter and the kernel disables it, no other devices on that irq will work either. The installation was completed but in the first boot i got. Created attachment 64232 procacpiwakeup additional pci ethernet card in sandybridge mb runs for a few minutes, then gets irq 19 nobody cared system details. Hi, a server of mine just dumped a backtrace below. Occured while using gedit, eclipse, firefox, and compiling java code in the terminal. Got some new hpc nodes, they seem to have trouble under load. I was using legacy because my ubuntu drive was created to be used on legacy mode. Id call for intel to recall all these buggy chips with known hardware defects that obviously cannot be fixed in software.